Posts Tagged ‘San Francisco real estate’

San Francisco's Noe Valley Luxury Homes Show Demand with Multiple Offers

Monday, March 1st, 2010

418 Liberty Street, San Francisco

The house at 418 Liberty in the desirable Dolores Heights neighborhood hit the market at $2,395,000 and really needs a full interior remodel but due to the desirability of the location, views, overall size and relatively good condition, it garnered 5 offers (4 were all cash, I was told).

Noe Valley’s location, weather and overall desirability continue to push it to the top of the City’s list for home buyers. The buyers I’m encountering in the $2million+ price range are comprised of a majority of folks from out of the area. I would say North side families head the list followed by folks moving into San Francisco for the first time or returning.

If you’re not familiar with Noe Valley, check it out on Nabewise. com or better yet spend an afternoon along 24th Street or at one of the local parks. And if you’d like some first hand information, give me a call.

All the Best,

Lance

415-793-6140

Off Market Sales "Gimick"…Is There Value for a Buyer?

Friday, February 26th, 2010

I recently met with two separate couples in the throes of the buying process. One had called me directly regarding a listing and another came into one of my open homes. Both cases were somewhat different, however in conversation both were in the process of interviewing agents. The one point they both independently brought up and wanted advice about was the ‘off market’ sales pitch they had heard from some other real estate agents they had spoken with.

Let’s look at the reality where ‘off market’ sales might occur. First, if the buyer has a very specific location in mind and would pay above current value and connect with ‘the’ agent who happens to have a client in that location. In this one scenario, you can see the two biggest variables…paying above market price and then through chance for most buyers finding the one agent who would have a connection in that location. Agents who promise off market deals may know of listings they have coming up but they don’t know ‘if’ or ‘how’ they will work for a specific buyer they just met.

The second case is one in which a seller is ‘in trouble’ and needs to sell and again the biggest variable is the specific agent or connection. Is the agent who’s promising you this ‘un-marketed’ inventory really going to deliver?

In a market such as San Francisco, where there is limited supply the sellers ‘always’ control the market. Yes, even now. I have spoken to sellers who had their homes on the market last year when the uncertainty was great enough that they wanted to sell. But last year, buyers for the most part weren’t biting (even though that was the time they should have). Now the economy has improved just enough that these folks are just ’sitting tight’..hence our current situation of lower than expected inventory.

It is human nature to want to believe we’re going to get in on the one deal that no one else will know about. The reality is, however, that situation won’t occur and its comparable to saving and becoming wealthy. It’s the consistent smart decisions with trustworthy advisors that get you to the finish line. One of my favorite lines comes from ‘Rich Dad, Poor Dad’ where the author says the two advisors he pays without question are his real estate agent and his attorney because they both make him many more times than they cost. And therein lies the hollowness of the ‘hook’ of ‘off market sales’, the real deals will go to those agents’ best and most loyal clients first. They won’t go to someone they just met.

All the Best,

Lance

415-793-6140

Heard on the Street: Brokers' Tour Recap

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

1188 Lombard

An exciting week in Bagdad-by-the-Bay, I toured the Mediterranean Villa at 1188 Lombard which is nice but the owners’ art collection is fantastic. And, I thought it extremely interesting that he/she is moving into the Millenium Tower on Mission Street from this ‘oh-so’ upscale address on Russian Hill. Looks like they’re moving to where the ‘action is’. Good for them and good for the City.

1896 Pacific Penthouse Suite

I went through the penthouse 1 bedroom condo at 1896 Pacific asking $4,495,000 and was a bit confused by the floor plan but expect this one to go to someone as a peit-a-terre. It has great decks and views and would be a great party pad but I’m not so sure about that price tag. It’s a ’spec’ for a local stager. Only time will tell on the pricing.

465 Hoffman

Over in Noe Valley, the second house in less than a week priced at $3million plus has gone under contract. That just continues to show you the strength of the market on the South side of the City. This is also the area that is projected to have the biggest appreciation going forward from the reading I’ve been doing. Location, location, location which is attached to all those jobs down the peninsula and in the fast growing pharmaceutical circle around the UCSF Medical Research campus. Looks to me like the energetic center of the City is really shifting this time……if those hob-nobbers on the Northern Hills are leaving for the Southland with a Mission Street address you know something is different.

245 Randall

The lower end of the spectrum is moving too….245 Randall asking $799,000 had 7 confirmed offers on Tuesday afternoon. Woo hoo!

That’s a short re-cap.

All the Best,

Lance

Networks and Networking

Friday, January 8th, 2010

I was part of a national phone conference for the U.S. Chapter of FIABCI with Realtors and Brokers from Manhattan, East Hampton, Washington D.C., Atlanta, and Seattle just to name a few to discuss what the strategies for success in real estate will be in 2010. The group unanimously agreed that building and working one’s network will be more important than ever in the new year. In the last 24 hours I have heard that re-iterated independently by other sources as well. CNN ran a segment on starting your own business in 2010 and how the dynamics were the best in years for starting a new business and a key to success was reaching out to one’s “network” or sphere of influence. The weekly sales meeting at my office, Alain Pinel Realtors, moderated by the Regional Vice President and my friend, Tim Murray, also stressed the importance of one’s “network” for success in the new year.

As we enter what many believe is the first year of recovery from our Bush-Recession, it is “back-to-basics” for everyone. Realtors and real estate  professionals of all types are getting back to basics and there is no better way to succeed than to contact those folks who already know you and have done business with you. In addition to contacting your existing network, a key question to ask yourself is, “how am I expanding my network?”. Where else do you go to meet new people whether in person or on the internet? These are important concepts and are being brought to the front-and-center of business plans for individuals and large businesses as well.

More to come….

Lance

Social Media Presentation Featuring Facebook Represenative

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

[wpvideo VdUJbrJI]The San Francisco Luxury Marketing Council hosted a presentation on social media with a panel made up of Adam Helwah of Secret Sushi Creative, a marketing and design company; Brandon Pierce, Regional Sales Director of Facebook (see video); along with a representative from Halogen Guides which targets busy, affluent consumers with online resources to help them make better decisions faster.

The panel led an in-depth discussion into how social media – Facebook, Twitter, etc. – has changed the marketing world from a “push” format to an open, uncontrolled conversation directly with consumers. The change is felt most acutely among the generation that didn’t grow up with a cell phone in their hand and the changes have created for them a sense of losing control. What I heard was actually very positive from the aspect of reaching your clients directly in a more informative way and being able to tailor your information to their needs and wants as well as creating more of a sense of community. I’m just really beginning to get involved in all the new media and its exciting and fun. The conversational aspect and sense of community are the two qualities I like the most. And from an international perspective, my foreign clients have found it most helpful in getting a better sense of the market here as well as of me, my community and my working style.

This topic is so timely and present on the fore front of business. The New York Times reports in its Friday, November 6th issue on the 99th annual conference of the Association of National Advertisers in Phoenix. Social media and its impact on marketing and advertising is a leading topic at this conference which just ended this past Sunday. The column’s author, Stuart Elliott quotes Michael Keller, chief brand officer at Dairy Queen, as saying, “Dairy Queen is going to be fighting it out to get more of our fair share of the market by continuing to focus on value, maintaining a presence in social media like Facebook and Twitter…”

Brandon Pierce of Facebook told our group we would see major efforts by large leading corporations on Facebook next year particularly the car manufacturers. This is once again a bottom up change that has far-reaching effects because it is increasing the information flow and breaking down barriers. I see this ultimately as a good thing. And, it means that the practice of interaction between each of us will be more direct, immediate and conversational at every level. I guess for an “old dog” like myself the most surprising insight from the evening’s discussion was that it is the leading edge of change not arrival at the place of change itself. Wow…the impact is just now causing ripples and where we land we won’t know for a while. That’s exciting.

So, let me know how social media is impacting your life and leave me a comment.

All the Best, Lance

How Well Do You Utilize Your Best Real Estate Resource?

Friday, November 6th, 2009

I’ve had two experiences with clients this year that highlight the vast difference in either how well people utilize their best real estate resource, their relationship with their Realtor, or how clumsily they don’t avail themselves of the benefit of that relationship which then impacts them negatively.

The first situation involves my clients, we’ll call Gail and Sergio for this example. They were referred to me from previous clients and we’ve had a great relationship from the start as they purchased their first home with me in San Francisco. They ultimately did remodeling and had two children in that home and we stayed in touch throughout the years. Whenever they had a real estate related question – they called me and they got an honest opinion on the market or what might be the best choice in a remodeling plan. Then when they decided they needed to move to the East Bay to be closer to family, friends and chosen schools they called me to discuss selling their home. By this time however, the market had changed and not to their favor. We discussed the marketing aspects as well as pricing. And, my pricing opinion, $899,000, was not what they wanted to hear but they trusted my judgment so we launched the marketing this past summer and because the house was priced at a price for value sensitive buyers - it sold well over asking at $950,000 (5.56% above) the first week on the market. They received more money than they expected but besides that they saved time (which is money) and the house didn’t have to suffer price reductions and a longer time on the market in a downward trending market with other variables we couldn’t control such as an unexpected increase in inventory. A true success story for wisely utilizing a Realtor relationship.

The second experience was with two gentlemen who were formally my tenants in a rental property I owned. A number of years ago as their lease was expiring they went out and purchased a house without a Realtor. The market was hot and they felt using the listing agent would get them the best deal. They paid a higher than asking price for the property which was common in the market of that time. They never called me for advice and moved on to their new property.

Fast forward to this summer when I received a call from them asking me to come by and give them my valuation opinion because they needed to sell the property. I arrived with my business partner to initially tour the house prior to forming a valuation opinion to see what remodeling work had been done. It was a lovely two-story Victorian and they had done a beautiful job  updating the kitchen and large family room. I, however, was shocked when touring the second floor to discover that during their ownership they had gone thru an extensive remodeling of the property by separating off the master bedroom from the main house and giving it a separate entrance from the rear of the house so it could be a second unit. Now this lovely Victorian had an abbreviated second floor with a cramped master bedroom and bath overlooking the front street, a second bedroom and a new bathroom at the end of the hall which created the separation between the main house and the second unit (which was formerly the spacious master bedroom and bath – now with a small kitchen added). To add to the negative impact the “new” second unit had on the main house, the tenant would have to access the small second unit by walking along the side of the house by the windows of the family room and through the outdoor patio off of the family room to get to their front door. Needless to say, they didn’t have a professional to talk to about the ramifications of this kind of remodeling on their overall investment in the property.

The comparables for this neighborhood had dropped quite a lot in the current environment. The value I gave them based on one lovely property that had sold within the last four weeks was a low price, $1,400,000. Since the current market is so value conscious, I suggested I call some colleagues at several other companies to come view the property to get some other opinions on pricing. I called six agents both within my brokerage company and at two others that I’ve had long professional relationships with to come by and let me know what they thought the value was. Across the board, the agents felt due to the awkward remodeling configuration that the house should be priced no higher than $1,500,000. Now, granted, that was higher than my value but in this tricky pricing environment I told the sellers it was a number I could get behind and with the right presentation get their property sold.

The sellers didn’t like the advice so they went price shopping. They found an agent (no big surprise) that would list the property for $1,695,000. The house sat. And, sat. They reduced it to $1,595,000. They did receive an offer and it sold for $1,550,000. (The number sounds familiar, doesn’t it..3.3% above my recommended and 9.35% below their original asking price.) They priced it higher than the current market value and in ultimately reducing the price created downward pressure on the final price they would achieve rather than pricing it lower and creating upward momentum.

These sellers never got beyond thinking of a relationship with a chosen Realtor as a sales situation rather than a relationship of trust for, most likely, their most valuable asset similar to the kind of relationship they would have with their attorney, accountant or physician. In the book, Rich Dad, Poor Dad, the author says the two professionals he never hesitates to pay are his attorney and his Realtor because they both make him money. The key is to have a “real” resource relationship with a trusted Realtor. One you can call on for advice at any time and know that the value will come to you when you need it most.

‘Til Next Time…All the Best, Lance